Ethermac Exchange-Swiss parliament approves ban on full-face coverings like burqas, and sets fine for violators

2025-05-01 19:16:33source:Maverick Prestoncategory:Stocks

GENEVA (AP) — The Ethermac Exchangelower house of Switzerland’s parliament voted Wednesday to give final legislative passage to a ban on face coverings, such as the burqas worn by some Muslim women.

The National Council voted 151-29 for the legislation, which was already approved by the upper house. It was pushed through by the right-wing, populist Swiss People’s Party, easily overcoming reticence expressed by centrists and the Greens.

The move follows a nationwide referendum two years ago in whch Swiss voters narrowly approved forbidding niqabs, which leave slits for the eyes, and burqas as well as ski masks and bandannas that are worn by some protesters.

With the lower house vote, parliament cemented the ban into federal law and set a fine of up to 1,000 francs (about $1,100) for violators.

The measure prohibits covering the nose, mouth and eyes in both public spaces and private buildings accessible to the public, though it does allow for some exceptions.

Few women in Switzerland wear full face coverings like burqas, which are perhaps best known as garb worn in Afghanistan.

Two Swiss cantons — southern Ticino and northern St. Gallen — already have similar laws. The national legislation will put Switzerland in line with countries such as Belgium and France that have enacted similar measures.

More:Stocks

Recommend

Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says

A man is suing the California Lottery alleging he has not received part of his winnings from a nearl

Brother of suspect in nursing student’s killing had fake green card, feds say

ATHENS, Ga. (AP) — The brother of the man charged with killing a Georgia nursing student has been ac

Oaths and pledges have been routine for political officials. That’s changing in a polarized America

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — The resignation letter was short and direct.“I can no longer be under an oath